|
Team
is united, but not on dog-eating issue
by Joyce Pangco Panares
BAGUIO
CITY&emdash;Team Unity's candidates may be united
as far as political and economic issues are
concerned, but for some of them, there are things
that they literally cannot stomach. Like dog
meat.
In
front of Baguio's residents who, according to
animal rights advocate Network for Animals consume
about 200 dogs daily, the administration's Senate
bets issued differing positions on the
controversial issue, which will be discussed when
Congress resumes sessions in June.
Former
Senator Tessie Aquino Oreta said she could not
imagine why anyone would want to eat dogs, which
are known to be man's best friend.
"I
have pet Labrador, Fidel, and I know I will be very
sad if something happens to him. Dogs are friends,
not food for the table. I wish everybody would be
kind to dogs, even those whose culture makes it
acceptable to eat dogs. Anyway, culture can be
changed over time," Oreta said.
Ilocos
Sur Gov. Luis Singson, despite his tough-guy image,
also admitted that he had a soft spot for dogs even
if he preferred Bengal tigers for pets.
"We
should teach [dog-eaters] to stop this
practice because this is very
humiliating.
international
community think of us? I know it's part of their
tradition, but these people can be educated so they
will learn to support animal rights," Singson
said.
But
former Senator Edgardo Angara, Zambales Gov.
Vicente Magsaysay, and Bukidnon Rep. Juan Miguel
said they were satisfied with an existing law, the
Philippines' Animal Welfare Act of 1998, which
prohibits the torture of all animals.
Angara
said the practice of eating dogs should be allowed
"during cultural events," while Zubiri, who has
positioned himself as the champion of the
environment, said traditions must be respected even
if he maintained that people should be humane to
animals in general.
But
Magsaysay, a confessed dog-eater, said lawmakers
should take a "calibrated response" to the problem
so as not to discriminate against traditional
dog-eaters in Baguio, Benguet, Ilocos and
Cagayan.
"I'm
Kapampangan, so I have tried eating everything from
dogs to goats. Stricter laws should be implemented,
but [we should] talk to the people here
first. For them, it's medicine and the warm meat is
a perfect partner to Baguio's cold temperature," he
said, adding that changes could not be expected to
happen overnight since this was a centuries-old
tradition.
Re-electionist
Joker Arroyo refused to take a stand on the issue,
saying: "I do not know anything about the dog meat
trade."
But
the candidate with the safest position over the
issue, which Oreta said was crucial in getting the
votes of the Cordillerans and other people who eat
dogs, was Sulu Sultan Jamalul Kiram.
Kiram
said that as a Muslim, he was bound by religion not
to eat dog meat, which is not considered halal or
clean under the Islamic tradition. But he said that
if a new law was passed on the matter, he would
support its implementation.
While
the Animal Welfare Act has helped to partly arrest
the problem of indiscriminate dog-eating, animal
rights groups claim that the law has failed to
prohibit commercial dog meat trading and only
provides lenient penalties.
Under
the law, arrested dog-meat traders may plead guilty
and pay a maximum fine of only P5,000.
Network
for Animals representative Melchor Alipio said the
fine was too small compared to the estimated P55
million in revenues that dog traders earn each
year.
Even
Malacañang has distanced itself from the
sticky issue of ending the dog-meat trading.
President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo acknowledged that
the people from Baguio eat dogs "to keep them
warm."
But
candidates who win in the May 14 mid-term polls
will have no choice but to brush up on the issue,
which is discussed in House Bill 2991 sponsored by
Rep. Ma. Rhodora Maiolo and introduced by Rep.
Francis Escudero, and which has the support of
animal-rights groups.
"Because
this barbaric industry provides a steady flow of
income not only to the traders but to officials and
police officers, the dog meat trade remains
untouched by the Welfare Act. Traders remain
elusive because the penalty is unrealistic, so with
this bill the penalty will be upgraded," Maiolo
said in a statement on www.thepetitionsite.com,
where 50,000 signatures are being gathered for the
cause in time for the June opening of
Congress.
|